About this project:
Several years after building the
current-linear
modulator for high-power LEDs around
Luxeon III LEDs,
very high-power
devices - called "Phlatlights"
tm produced by
Luminus Devices
became available - namely the CBT-54.
Compared to the Luxon IIIs that had been successfully used for
long-distance optical
communications of over 273 km, the specifications of the
Phlatlight devices were very impressive: They could
operate with good efficiency with currents of over 2.5 amps/mm
2.
With a die size of 5.4mm
2, the LED could safely
handle a continuous current of at least 8.5 amps when properly
heat-sinked, providing unprecedented levels of light output from
a fairly small source area.
Upon obtaining several of these devices I ran some tests and
concluded to my satisfaction that the claims were true.
For optical communications, however, it takes more than just
lighting up an LED: One has to modulate it, but what was a
"safe" amount? The spec sheets showed that they could be
driven to 8.5 amps continuously and to 13.5 amps with a 50% duty
cycle - but other than a graph on the data sheet that went
slightly above 15 amps, there was no mention of a "maximum peak"
current.
From one of the documents that I'd found on the Luminus web site
(alas, since removed...)
I spotted a note that they'd been doing long-term endurance
testing of Phlatlight modules at continuous currents of 2.5
amps/mm
2 and had observed no failures - the same
current density as 13.5 amp figure quoted in the data sheet for
50% duty cycle drives. Bolting a device to a heat sink, I
did careful testing at approximately 22 amps and found that,
with an "infinite" heat sink, and operated the device for 30
seconds while noting the temperature reported by the CBT-54's
on-board thermistor. After being relieved that the device
survived just fine, I crunched the numbers and determined that
even being overdriven, the calculated LED die temperature was
below the "maximum" noted in the specification sheet
(125C for
the red emitters.)
Comment:
- I did manage to destroy one CBT-54 by accidentally
connecting it to a 2200uF capacitor that was charged to 13.5
volts, causing all of the bond wires connecting the cathode
of the LED to be burned open. The total amount of peak
current was unknown, but apparently well over 20 amps!
This told me what I needed to know: The devices were going
to survive a resting current of 8-9 amps with peaks to 18-22
amps at 100% modulation, a fact that has been field-tested with
hours of operation.
Now, what does one use to drive an LED to 22 amps and do so
efficiently so that there was some hope of being able to run the
modulator from "luggable" batteries? A new modulator had
to be designed.
In order to linearly modulate the intensity of an LED it is
necessary to vary the amount of current flowing through the
device rather than the voltage across it. It is fortunate
that the luminous output of an LED is linearly proportional to
the current flowing through it: At higher currents, the
"current versus light output" curve "flattens" a little bit, but
this results on only a very small amount
(a few percent at
most - see the sidebar below) of distortion and is
unnoticeable in voice communications.
Figure 1:
Schematic of the high-compliance current sink,
used as a high-power LED modulator.
Click on the image for a larger version.
|
Notes:
- When you use an LED other than what is mentioned below,
please take into account the current ratings of the
devices that you plan to use.
- The circuits shown on this page are quite
adaptable: With the techniques described below, I
have constructed modulators for LEDs with current ranges
from just a few milliamps to 10's of amps!
- Please heed the comments on the use of the LM324 for
these circuits - see the sidebar,
below.
- The CBT-54 was discontinued in 2009 or 2010. The
equivalent device is the PT-54. A smaller device
with the same current density is the CBT-40 which is
arguably better-suited to point-to-point optical
communications.
First, a bit of explanation as to how the basic
circuit works.
The "Precision Current Sink":
The basic current sink circuit may be seen in
Figure 1. This circuit
uses a single section of an operational amplifier "wrapped
around" a transistor and using a current sense resistor and it
works thusly:
- Assume that 1 volt is applied to the non-inverting input
of the op amp at Vin.
- If the voltage across Rsense
is lower than 1
volt, the output voltage of the op amp is increased, turning
FET - Q1 - on until enough current flows through Rsense to
achieve a voltage drop equal to that of Vin. Ohm's law
tells us that if Rsense
is equal to 1 ohm, we will achieve a drop of exactly one
volt when the current through Rsense is one amp. Likewise, if the
current is higher than one amp the op amp will reduce the drive to Q1 to
reduce the voltage drop across Rsense until it is one volt.
- As the voltage applied to Vin changes, the op amp will change the
drive to make the current through Rsense proportional to Vin. Because the
drain current through Q1 is the same as the source current
(ignoring the minute amount of gate-source leakage) we know
that the current through the LED's current will be the same
as that of Rsense.
- Cfilt is important in that it provides a
low-impedance source current. Without it, audio would
be imposed on the power supply leads and get into other
circuits. Also, there is no guarantee that the power
source - be it a battery or power supply - will provide a
low impedance path at all frequencies - especially if fairly
long power leads are used. For high-power (>1 watt)
LEDs, a recommended value is at least 1000uF.
One of the most important things to note about this circuit is
that
LED and supply voltage is irrelevant -
provided, of course, that the supply voltage (V+) is sufficient
to overcome the voltage drop across the resistor, LED and the
resistance of the FET. In other words, the voltage drop
across the FET could be zero volts or 5 volts and as long as the
supply voltage high is enough to overcome the voltage drops
across the circuit's components
(7 volts would probably be
adequate) it doesn't matter! If you use
much
more voltage for your power supply (V+) than the LED and drop
across Rsense require, you'll be excess power in Q1 as
heat: As long as Q1 is properly rated and heat-sinked, it
will work fine, but such operation may be wasteful -
particularly if you are using battery power!
To make this circuit practical for use as a linear modulator for
speech, several refinements need to be made:
- A fixed DC voltage needs to be applied to Vin to establish an
"idling current" for the LED. This idling current
would be set to half that of the expected peak
current - a value that would correlate with "100% positive
modulation." For the Luminus CBT-54 and PT-54, this
would be 8.5-9 amps and for the CBT-40 and PT-39, this would
be 6.25-6.75 amps - values that correlate to 1.6-1.7 amps/mm2.
- Modulation needs to be applied. The voltage at Vin would, in addition
to the fixed DC voltage, have the audio modulation applied
to it. In this case, this would be a peak-to-peak
voltage twice that of the fixed voltage.
- A few additional capacitors need to be added to make the
modulator stable under varying current conditions.
Figure 2:
Schematic of the "simplified" high-power LED
Linear Modulator. The circuit depicted is for
demonstration purposes and it is recommended that if you
wish to build a modulator, construct that depicted in
Figure 3 (below) instead.
Click on the image for a larger version.
|
Circuit description of a simple, high-power
modulator:
The modulator shown in
Figure
2 is a refinement of that in
Figure 1, but with added components to ensure
stability and allow easy adjustments of maximum current and
idling current.
The main difference is in the current sense resistance in the
source of the FET, R8. Since up to 22 amps are going to be
conducted, a lower-value resistor is appropriate to maintain
operational headroom and with the 0.1 ohm value shown, we could
expect to see 2.2 volts across it at that current. Another
component that was "scaled up" was C6, a 6800uF capacitor that
provides instantaneous current during modulation peaks -
something that may be difficult to deliver due to resistive
losses in wiring from the battery - as well as improving overall
circuit stability.
For a "reference", U1 provides a stable, clean voltage source
that is used to set the idle currents by biasing line and
microphone amplifiers at 5 volts. There are also to
potentiometers: R5 is used to set the
maximum idle current when
R3 is set to "full" while R3 is used to adjust the idle current
from the maximum value set by R5 all the way down to zero.
The advantage of this scheme is that the applied modulation
depth stays constant at
all settings of R3
making it very easy to adjust the power level as necessary for
the link, to conserve battery power and to run link margin
tests. Note that if operated from a 12 volt source, it is
possible for the
positive
modulation excursions to briefly exceed 100%
(e.g. >10 volts
at the output of U2c) but being AC-coupled, these peak currents
cannot be maintained and are unlikely to ever cause damage to
the LED.
Also provided are switches SW1 and SW2. SW1, when open,
effectively disables the LED while SW2 - a momentary push button
type - allows easy on/off keying of the LED when SW1 is
open: If a tone-modulated audio source is applied to the
audio input, this allows sending of Morse by interrupting the
light.
U2c amplifies "line level" audio
(from a computer or portable
audio player) to the 10 volts peak-to-peak required to achieve
100% modulation while also functioning as a mixer for the audio
from U2d, an amplifier that can take inputs from line to
microphone level
(adjustable using R15) to the needed
level. U2b is a unity-gain buffer that takes a sample of
the audio from U2a's input to drive either a headphone or the
input of an audio recorder to allow monitoring of what is being
applied to the modulator.
Particular attention should be noted to the connection of
"Battery V-" to the rest of the modulator circuit. Because
of the currents involved, it is recommended that the
high-current components
(Q1, R8 and C6) be mounted on a heavy
ground plane with the ground of the rest of the circuit
(U1, U2
and associated components) be connected in exactly
ONE
place - preferably very near the grounded end of R8 - to
maintain stability.
The voltage of Battery V+ will tremendously affect the overall
efficiency of the modulator. If Battery V+ is 12 volts, a
significant
(>30 watts) amount of heat will be dissipated by
Q1 requiring a good heat sink with 8-10 watts also being
dissipated in R8 as well and if portable, battery operation is
anticipated, this represents a tremendous amount of wasted
power. If the situation allows for "power to burn"
(e.g.
line-operated power supply or an adequately-large battery -
perhaps tied to a vehicle) then this extra heat might be put to
good use to keep dew from forming on the optics or even to keep
your hands warm!
Efficiency can be improved by reducing the Battery V+ voltage to
the absolute minimum required. Considering that the red
Phlatlight will drop about 2.8 volts at peak current
(22 amps)
and R8's 0.1 ohms will drop 2.2 volts at this same
current. If we assume that we can reasonably pull 22 amps
through the FET (Q1) at an "on" resistance of 0.05 ohm with its
drop of 1.1 volts, we can see that we'd neeed only 6.1 volts and
far less power would be wasted as heat. If we drop the
value of R8 to 0.025 ohms, we can economize still-further making
operation
(of the LED portion, at least) from a 6 volt battery
practical.
(Note that
the rest of the circuit would need higher voltage, but only a
few 10's of milliamps would be required which could be
provided by four 1.5 volt AA or AAA batteries in series with
the 6 volt LED supply.)
Knowing that a high-current source of 6 volts is not
particularly convenient, it would be advantageous to be able to
derive the "Batt V+" voltage from a 12 volt power source that we
(probably) already have, and for that we should use a switching
voltage converter.
A high-current switching
converter:
Figure 3:
Switching voltage converter for the high-power
LED modulator.
Click on the image for a larger version.
|
See Figure 3
Comments about
commercially available, ready-built DC-DC converters:
I am one of those people that will often build a circuit just
for the fun (and education) of doing so. If you don't
wish to build a switching voltage converter from "scratch" you
can find suitable high-efficiency DC-DC converters. For
red LEDs, high-current, 5 volt DC-DC converters are readily
available new for reasonable cost.
An example of this would be a line of high-efficiency DC-DC
converters made by Murata that will operate from 10-15 volts
input and are able to supply 10-20 amps at 5 volts, depending
on the model. For the CBT-54/PT-54, a 15 amp converter
is adequate since the "peak" modulation currents would be
supplied by C6 and the average current would be just within
the maximum ratings of the converter. Some converters
have voltage adjustment capability to allow tweaking of the
supply voltage to that just above that
required to keep the modulator from clipping during positive
peak excursions and thus reducing the amount wasted power even
more.
As with the modulator described above, the high-current
components (input capacitors C101-C104, output capacitors
C113-C116, the FETs Q101 and Q102 L102 and R103) are
assembled using single-point ground techniques - preferably
on a solid ground plane. The rest of the circuit (U101
and related components) may be mounted on a small board
nearby, connecting to the main ground plane at only one place, near the output
capacitors' ground.
U101, the Linear Technologies LT1339 is a "universal"
synchronous switchmode power supply controller whereby Q101
forms the series switch and Q102 acts as a low-loss
(synchronous) rectifier in order to achieve >92%
efficiency at high currents. During initial
testing, neither Q101 or Q102 had heat sinks,
yet they only got slightly warm (but not hot) when the supply's
output was loaded to 20 amps! For the most part, the
design of this circuit is very straightforward, taken from
the device's data sheet.
One minor departure from the "standard circuit" is that of
the circuits surrounding Q103-Q105. If voltage
is applied to the "Green Sense" input, Q103-Q105 are turned
on, putting R108 in the circuit and raising the
voltage. This was done to allow both red and green
Phlatlight LEDs to be used, with the red units needing just
4.2 volts at the drain of the modulator transistor while the
green need a bit more the 6 volts. (When a green Phlatlight is
plugged in, there is a wire that feeds voltage to this
point to "auto-sense" which type of LED is connected.)
Other notes: R103 sets the maximum current to 20-22
amps, C108 sets the switching frequency to the 40-50 kHz
area, D104 quenches the effects of Miller capacitance, and
R106 sets the voltage when the "Green Sense" input is low
(e.g. not active) and should always be adjusted before R108. Also
of note is the presence of R101, a 9 amp self-resetting fuse
which, in conjunction with D101 and D102, provides
reverse-polarity protection in addition to overcurrent fault
protection.
Figure 4:
Top: Minimized version of the high-power
LED modulator.
Bottom: A
version of the high-power LED modulator with voltage and
current monitoring.
Click on an image for a larger version.
|
|
An enhanced high-current
modulator with monitoring:
See
Figure 4 for the following discussion.
The circuits in Figure 4
are based on that in Figure
2, but with additional circuitry for amplifying the
input audio source as well as monitoring what is actually
being sent to the LED with the bottom diagram including a digital panel
meter that gives the user an indication of the LED's idle
current, modulator's operating voltage and the supply
(battery) voltage - all helpful tools when actually
operating the unit.
The description below references the lower
diagram in Figure 4.
For monitoring voltage and current, a red LED digital
panel meter was used to allow it to be seen in total
darkness without affecting the dark-adapted eye. In
testing it was noted that the panel meter was almost
painfully bright when viewed in total darkness but testing
revealed that this meter - based on the venerable ICL7107
- functioned properly down to 3.2 volts with a significant
reduction of LED brightness and to this end, D202 and D203
were used to drop the voltage to 3.6-3.8 volts. Other
modules (some not
based on the ICL7107) were also tested and not all
of them worked properly at much lower than 5 volts.
Depending on your preference, an LCD meter could also be
used with the caveat that if you plan to use this at night,
having a self-illuminated display is very helpful! If
your meter is too bright for night use and you can't easily
lower the brightness any other way, a piece of darkened
plastic could be placed in front of the display.
This meter is a typical "3-1/2 digit" type with no scaling
resistors on its input and as such, will display a
full-scale reading of "1999" with an input of 199.9 mV with
the position of the decimal point being user-selectable with
a jumper. SW204 selects one of several resistive
dividers used to monitor the battery input voltage, the LED
voltage, and the LED current as sensed across R206-R209 with
R224, R226 and R227 providing scaling for these inputs,
respectively. Because the least significant digit of
the meter represents just 100 microvolts, it is important
that wiring be done carefully with the ground reference of
the low current portions of the modulator being connected to
the high current sections in only one place - preferably
near the ground end of the current sense resistors R206-R209
- to avoid inaccuracies due to ground loops. Even with
these precautions it is likely that slight negative biases
may occur due to slight voltage drops in the connecting
wiring so high-value resistors (1 Megohm to 22 Megohms as
appropriate) are wired between the wipers of R224, R226
and/or R227 and the +5 volt supply as necessary to offset
these effects - which are typically on the order of 100-400
microvolts. It should be noted that the highest-order
digit (the far-left "1") isn't used and the decimal point
between the right-most two digits is activated (e.g. battery
voltage is displayed as "12.6" which correlates to 12.6
millivolts being applied to the input of the meter.)
Switch SW201 - a center-off SPDT - selects either the
internal audio amplifiers (U202c and U202d), an external
modulator or neither (center). The external modulator
just happens to be the one described in Figure 4 of the current-linear
modulator for high-power LEDs (a signal from pin 7 of U1b
of this modulator via of 100 ohm resistor) which is at 5 volts
resting current with 10 volts peak-to-peak of audio at 100%
modulation. This external modulator is preferred as it has
a built-in audio compressor and tone generator and its use
eliminated the need to replicate those circuits. As with
the other modulator, momentary push button switches are
available
(when SW201 is in the center-off position) to allow
on-off keying of the LED.
Comments:
- Use only an
LM324 on the circuits shown in Figure 4!
If another op amp is used, it must be either capable of operating down
to the negative rail or a negative supply (of at least 2
volts) must be supplied. The use of a different op amp
will likely require that the circuit be modified to provide
appropriate compensation so that the driver stage (U202a) is
stable (e.g. does not oscillate.)
- The frequency response of the circuit shown in Figure 4 is pretty flat
to 12 kHz, dropping to %80 maximum modulation at 15 kHz and
down to 50% modulation at 30 kHz although the modulation can
be driven higher than this if a bit of nonlinearity can be
tolerated. This frequency response is largely a
limitation of the LM324 itself and higher modulation
frequencies are possible with faster op amps but be aware
that the highly capacitive gate capacitance of the FET and
the rather large capacitance of the LED itself - both being
properties that conspire against a stable circuit!
- As noted above, the drain voltage of the power FET driving
the LED can be much higher than the voltage noted (4-5 volts
for red LEDs, 6-7 volts for green and blue) but that this
will tremendously increase the amount of heat dissipated in
the power FET, requiring an appropriate amount of
heat-sinking.
The upper-left picture in Figure 5 shows the finished
modulator with the LED digital power meter and selector
switch that allows the battery voltage, LED voltage or LED
current to be displayed. In the lower-right corner of
the front panel may be seen the LED current control which
allows adjustment from under 100 milliamps to full current
(amps!) without affecting the modulation
depth.
The upper-right picture in Figure
5 shows the internals of the modulator with the
low-level electronics and metering being mounted in the lid
and the high-current portions being built on copper-clad
circuit board material using single-point grounding
techniques. What is not
shown is RFI protection that was added after the pictures
were taken which included putting large snap-on ferrite
beads on all leads into and out of the modulator. This
was found to be necessary because of the fact that with the
high-power switching converter, "hash" was radiated that
decreased the effective sensitivity of a 2 meter
handie-talkie placed nearby. Another effective RFI
minimization scheme was simply grounding the heat sink
itself to the main, internal ground plane - a tactic which
makes sense considering that the switching transistors are
bolted to it! Prior to adding the ferrites, the
modulator also exhibited a degree of RF sensitivity where
the idle current was affected by a close-by RF source,
namely a handie-talkie being used next to the modulator.
Visible in this same picture is a small cooling fan that
relieves heat from the large toroid visible as well as
drawing air past the rear of the heat sink to provide a
degree of extra cooling. Worth mentioning is the
presence of a "Fan V+" voltage on the power supply diagram (Figure 3) that provides
an "isolated" power supply for both the small on-board fan
as well as that on the LED module itself. Without the
10 ohm resistor and capacitor (R113 and C116) it is likely
that the "whine" of the fan will find its way into
everything else - including the LED's own modulation!
Figure 5:
Top Left:
View of the front panel of the high-power modulator
containing the switching voltage converter and the LED
voltage/current metering.
Top Right:
Inside the modulator. In the bottom of the box
(lower) is the switching voltage converter on the right
and the modulator transistor and current-sense resistors
on the left. In the lid may be seen the low-level
modulator components (U202) and related circuitry.
Bottom Left:
green and red Phlatlight modules mounted to heat
sinks with secondary optics.
Bottom Right:
A side view of one of the Phlatlight modules showing the
heat sinking and the cooling fan.
Click on an image for a larger version.
|
|
|
|
The importance of maintaining 100% modulation:
Up to this point "100% modulation" has been mentioned - but not
explained. For the purposes of this discussion, 100%
modulation refers to the fact that the LED's current varies
about a "resting" current from zero to
twice the
resting current. As it turns out, this range represents
the
maximum that the amplitude-modulated LED can
be driven and avoid distortion of the original signal.
If you were to attempt to exceed 100% modulation, the most
obvious side-effect would be that some portion of your waveforms
would try to go
below zero current - something
that is clearly impossible - and that portion of the audio would
be hard-clipped, causing distortion. On the "positive"
side of the modulation, it may be possible that the current
could go above twice the resting current - at least until the
op-amp, transistor and/or power supply ran out of
voltage/current "swing" at which point it would "hard
clip." As mentioned above, the circuits described, when
operated from 12-14 volts - a range that encompasses portable
battery operation - can produce around 125% positive modulation.
Practically speaking, however, one
can overdrive the
audio circuit and cause a significant amount of clipping
(perhaps 10-20%) and actually
improve intelligibility
somewhat under noisy/weak-signal conditions. While the
fidelity of the speech is obviously reduced, the impact on its
intelligibility is generally negligible and the fact that the
"peak-to-average" ratio is reduced
(that is, the "quiet"
portions of speech are louder by comparison than the loudest
portions) and the overall "speech power" is actually increased
and can be better heard when conditions are poor.
Exactly how much "clipping" is "too much"? That's mostly a
matter of taste. Clearly, if one runs the audio too "hot"
then excessive clipping will result in enough audio distortion
to reduce intelligibility. Again, it should be noted that
the circuits in
Figure 3 and
Figure 4, when
operated from a 12-14 volt supply,
can be run into
clipping without much fear of damaging the LED as they
intrinsically limit the maximum amount of LED current to a
reasonably safe value.
The same cannot be said of the
circuit in Figure 2, however!
What about
lower than 100% modulation? If one
doesn't fully-modulate the LED, the result is that the amount of
audio being conveyed by the lightbeam is reduced and it will
sound "quieter." Where this becomes an issue is where the
signal is already weak or competing with noise: A
badly-undermodulated
(or "quiet") signal is at a significant
disadvantage and is clearly not being used to its full
potential. As a matter of comparison, modulating at only
50% represents a 6dB drop in audio while modulating to just 30%
is about 10dB!
In other words, in terms of overall effectiveness it's better to
run the audio a bit "hot" and put up with a little bit of
distortion than run it too low!
Final comments:
Since its construction in 2009, this modulator - and its twin -
have seen use out in the field and aside from the aforementioned
RFI problems - which have been mitigated - have worked
flawlessly. Phlatlight modules shown in
Figure 5 have been fitted to
my
Foldable Enclosure and
a similar red unit has been also fitted to my
First Enclosure
giving us a complete working pair of units with which we have
conducted a number of experiments -
including some in
broad daylight!
More pictures will be added in
the near future.
Return to the KA7OEI Optical
communications Index page.
If you have questions or comments concerning the
contents of this page, or are interested in this circuit, feel
free to contact me using the information at this URL.
Keywords:
Lightbeam
communications,
light
beam,
lightbeam,
laser
beam, modulated light, optical communications,
through-the-air optical communications, FSO
communications, Free-Space Optical communications,
LED communications, laser communications, LED,
laser, light-emitting diode, lens, fresnel, fresnel
lens, photodiode, photomultiplier, PMT,
phototransistor, laser tube, laser diode, high power
LED, luxeon, cree, phlatlight, lumileds, modulator,
detector
This page and contents
copyright 2007-2015. Last update: 20150820